Daniel Evans vs Stuart Parker Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Predictions on Upcoming Tennis Match:

1. Second serve performance in recent form:

   Examining their performance in the past six months, Evans has emerged victorious in 49.02% of points on their second serve, whereas Parker has secured a slightly lower rate of 48.55%. This statistic demonstrates a notably strong correlation with the accuracy of match predictions.

2. Return game statistics in recent form:

   Considering recent events, Evans has demonstrated a success rate of 48.08% when capitalizing on their opponent's second serve points, while Parker has achieved a slightly higher rate of 49.08%. Moreover, when it comes to first serve returns, their respective percentages stand at 30.39% and 32.23%, further aiding the prediction of the favored player in this imminent faceoff.

3. Under pressure analysis:

   Under duress, Evans has successfully saved 55.77% of breakpoints, whereas Parker has managed to save 57.23%. This becomes a crucial statistic for predicting in-game bets.

4. Performance overview:

   Reviewing their overall performance in the past year, Evans has secured victory in 40.43% of matches (19 wins, 28 losses), whereas Parker boasts a stronger record with a 59.62% success rate (31 wins, 21 losses), forming the foundation for an encompassing head-to-head prediction overview.

5. Surface specialties:

   Evans excels on I.hard, with a career win rate of 62% (168 wins, 103 losses), while their performance on Clay courts drops to 46% (48 wins, 56 losses). On the other hand, Parker's career win rate peaks at 69% on Hard courts (138 wins, 63 losses), but falters on Grass with a rate of 38% (8 wins, 13 losses).

6. Player level:

   Examining the past year, Evans has competed predominantly in the Challengers/ITF tournaments with a prize pool of over $10K, securing victory in 53.33% of matches (8 wins, 7 losses). Conversely, Parker has primarily participated in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a prize pool of $10K, achieving a success rate of 63.41% (26 wins, 15 losses). Therefore, when comparing statistics between the players, it is paramount to consider the level of events they have been playing in to predict the favored player accurately.

7. Opponent quality statistics:

   Throughout the past 12 months, Evans has faced opponents with an average ranking of 141.06, whereas Parker has encountered players with an average ranking of 364.38.

8. Deciding set performance versus all players:

   Intrigued by live predictions and betting opportunities, it is worth noting that Evans has triumphed in 44% of deciding sets in the last year, while Parker boasts a remarkable 69% success rate in all matches played on tour.

9. Current event head-to-head stats:

   Although past performance carries weight in predicting tennis matches, it is also essential to evaluate the current event statistics to identify players in top form. Therefore, it is advisable to refer to the section below (click here) if the players under scrutiny have already participated in any matches within the present event. Additionally, it is crucial to recognize that certain players may exhibit superior performances at particular events, and this factor should be considered when determining the outcome.

10. Break point conversion:

    Analyze their recent achievements, and you will find that Evans has successfully converted 37.87% of breakpoint opportunities, while Parker has converted 38.36% of their chances to break their opponent's serve. This information serves as a valuable statistic for in-game live betting tips whenever either player gains a breakpoint opportunity.

11. If you seek models that can accurately forecast tennis matches, this article provides a solid starting point. (Disclaimer: Reserved for devoted statistics enthusiasts)